Photo by Max Bender on Unsplash

Photo by Max Bender on Unsplash

Neighborhood Networks and Urban Social

Integration based on Everyday Urban Mobility

Living in disadvantaged neighborhoods is widely assumed to undermine life chances because residents are isolated from neighborhoods with greater resources. Yet, residential isolation may be mitigated by individuals spending much of their everyday lives outside their home neighborhoods, a possibility that has been difficult to assess on a large scale. With colleagues, I have studied the consequences of urban mobility for the social structure of cities, including how a neighborhoods vitality depends not only on its own conditions, but also the conditions of the neighborhoods to which its residents are connected, through networks of everyday urban mobility.

Based on this framework, this ongoing project highlights three arguments. The first is that even though residents of disadvantaged neighborhoods may travel far and wide, their relative isolation by race and class persists. The second is that mobility-based socioeconomic disadvantage explains neighborhood rates of violence beyond residential-based disadvantage. Third, we argue that a city’s degree of social connectedness depends on how uneven and concentrated the networks of everyday mobility are among its neighborhoods, which in turn are hypothesized to predict rates of crime across cities beyond that expected by their residential-based segregation. We test these propositions using geocoded networks of movement throughout the 50 largest American cities. The results offer a new way of thinking about neighborhood effects, spatial inequality, and structural theories of crime.  We also are producing new measures of racially segregated mobility for cities and triple disadvantage for the neighborhoods of each of America’s largest cities that will be posted publicly.

Selected Papers and articles: